Audi A4
2015–2023The last A4 developed around the combustion line-up first
- Base price
- 44,600 €
- 0–100 km/h
- 7.1 s
- Power
- 204 PS
- Consumption, combined
- 6.4 l/100 km
Two generations, eight model years apart. The B9 closed out the combustion-first era of the A4; the B10 opened the PPC platform chapter. We put both on the same set of figures and looked at what the newer car actually gives you.
The last A4 developed around the combustion line-up first
First A4 on PPC, with mild-hybrid across the entire range
The eight changes that matter, before the detail
The B9 closed out the MLB evo cars; the B10 is the first A4 on PPC. Everything below follows from that — the axles move, the body grows, the boot gives way to the electrified hardware.
MLB evo → PPC4,762 mm becomes 4,829 mm. The wheelbase accounts for most of it at +63 mm, so the growth is between the axles rather than in the overhangs.
+67 mm1,388 mm becomes 1,444 mm, with the tracks widening 52 mm at the front and 56 mm at the rear. The B10 sits taller and stands wider, not just longer.
+56 mm1,560 kg becomes 1,695 kg. That is the single largest change on this page, and it is what the figures below are paying for.
+135 kg480 l becomes 445 l. The one number that moves the wrong way for anyone who loads the car rather than drives it.
−35 l6.4 l/100 km becomes 6.6. The newer car is the thirstier one in our catalogue's figures — the extra 135 kg is not free, and the platform change does not pay it back here.
+0.2 l/100 km210 km/h becomes 248 km/h, with torque up 14 Nm to 340 Nm. The B10 is the faster car at the top of the range even though it is slower off the line.
+38 km/h4.4 s becomes 4.8 s. Against the weight gain, the extra torque does not hold the acceleration — a rare case of a newer generation losing a headline figure outright.
+0.4 sBoth outlines are drawn at the same scale from the catalogue's measurements.
Drag the handle to reveal the newer generation. Photographs come from our catalogue.
Drag the handle, or use the arrow keys after selecting it.
Where the two compared generations sit in the model's history
Everything that arrived, improved, changed or disappeared
The B10 is the larger car in every external dimension: 67 mm longer, 63 mm more wheelbase, 56 mm taller, and 52 mm wider across the front track. It is also 135 kg heavier, and that weight is what the rest of the figures are paying for.
It buys a higher top speed and 14 Nm more torque. It costs 0.2 l/100 km at the pump, 0.4 s to 60 mph, and 35 litres of boot. Peak power is unchanged at 204 PS. Whether that trade is worth making depends on which of those numbers you meet daily — which is what the verdict below is about.
| Figure | B9 | B10 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kerb weight | 1,560 kg | 1,695 kg | +135 kg |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 248 km/h | +38 km/h |
| Wheelbase | 2,829 mm | 2,892 mm | +63 mm |
| Boot space | 480 l | 445 l | −35 l |
| Consumption, combined | 6.4 l/100 km | 6.6 l/100 km | +0.2 l/100 km |
The newer car is the thirstier one and the slower one off the line. That is what the catalogue says, and it is what we publish.
Identical rows are dimmed; the delta column shows the direction of travel
| Full spec sheet with deltas | Audi A45 generation, restyling · 40 TFSI S-tronic · 204 PS · FWD · Robotic | Audi A53 generation · 2.0 TFSI S tronic · 204 PS · FWD · Automatic | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
| Base price | 44,600 € | — | |
| Main | |||
| Transmission | Robotic | Automatic | |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 248 km/h (best) | +38 km/h |
| 0–100 km/h | 7.1 s | — | |
| 0–60 mph | 4.4 s (best) | 4.8 s | +0.4 s |
| Kerb weight | 1,560 kg (best) | 1,695 kg | +135 kg |
| Gross weight | 2,060 kg | — | |
| Power and torque | |||
| Power at rpm | 4475 – 6000 | 4300 | |
| Torque | 326 Nm | 340 Nm (best) | +14 Nm |
| Torque at rpm | 1450 – 4275 | 2000 | |
| Fuel, consumption and emissions | |||
| Mild hybrid | MHEV12V | — | |
| Consumption, urban | 8.9 l/100 km | — | |
| Consumption, extra-urban | 5.4 l/100 km | — | |
| Consumption, combined | 6.4 l/100 km (best) | 6.6 l/100 km | +0.2 l/100 km |
| Emission standard | Euro 6 | — | |
| Fuel tank | 54 l | 56 l | +2 l |
| Engine | |||
| Compression ratio | 11.7 | 12.5 | |
| Bore × stroke, mm | 82.5 × 92.8 | 82.5 x 92.8 | |
| Dimensions and capacity | |||
| Length | 4,762 mm | 4,829 mm | +67 mm |
| Width | 1,847 mm | 1,860 mm | +13 mm |
| Height | 1,388 mm | 1,444 mm | +56 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,829 mm | 2,892 mm (best) | +63 mm |
| Front track | 1,572 mm | 1,624 mm | +52 mm |
| Rear track | 1,555 mm | 1,611 mm | +56 mm |
| Boot space | 480 l (best) | 445 l | −35 l |
| Boot space, seats folded | — | 1,299 l | |
| Wheels, suspension and brakes | |||
| Tyre size | 205/60 R16 | — | |
Scored on the figures above, not on brand loyalty
Still the pragmatic pick. Physical controls, a manual option on the used market, and a price that has already taken its depreciation hit.
Quieter, more efficient and better equipped, but you pay for it up front and give up 15 litres of boot and every physical climate control.
Other ways to place this car