Audi RS6 vs BMW M5 vs Mercedes-AMG E63: specs side by side
Every figure below comes straight from our catalog database. The better value in each row is highlighted in green, and rows where the cars are identical can be hidden.
- Audi RS6
- Base price
- —
- Power
- 600 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 3.6 s
- Boot space
- 565 l
- BMW M5
- Base price
- —
- Power
- 727 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- —
- Boot space
- 466 l
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class AMG
- Base price
- —
- Power
- 612 PS
- 0–100 km/h
- 3.4 s
- Boot space
- 540 l
Same years, different cars
Each model's generations on one timescale, with the compared ones marked
Audi RS6
BMW M5
Mercedes-Benz E-Class AMG
Specifications
Best value per row in green: lower price, 0–100 time, consumption and weight; higher power, range and boot space
Units
| Specifications | Audi RS64 generation · 4.0 AT · 600 PS · 4x4 · Automatic | BMW M57 generation · 4.4 V8 Plug-in Hybrid M xDrive M Steptronic · 727 PS · 4x4 · Automatic | Mercedes-Benz E-Class AMG5 generation · 4.0 AT · 612 PS · 4x4 · Automatic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main | |||
| Number of gears | 8 | 8 | 9 |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.6 s | — | 3.4 s (best) |
| 0–60 mph | 2.2 s | 2.2 s | 2.1 s (best) |
| Kerb weight | 2,150 kg | 2,435 kg | 1,880 kg (best) |
| Gross weight | 2,740 kg | — | 2,525 kg |
| Power and torque | |||
| Power | 600 PS | 727 PS (best) | 612 PS |
| Power at rpm | 6000 – 6250 | — | 5750 – 6500 |
| Torque | 800 Nm | 1,000 Nm (best) | 850 Nm |
| Torque at rpm | 2050 – 4500 | — | 2500 – 4500 |
| Fuel, consumption and emissions | |||
| Fuel grade | 98 | 95 | 98 |
| Mild hybrid | MHEV48V | — | — |
| Consumption, urban | 21.5 l/100 km | — | 11.7 l/100 km (best) |
| Consumption, extra-urban | 10.9 l/100 km | — | 7.6 l/100 km (best) |
| Consumption, combined | 12.9 l/100 km | 1.7 l/100 km (best) | 9.1 l/100 km |
| Emission standard | Euro 6 | — | Euro 6 |
| Fuel tank | 73 l | 60 l | 66 l |
| Engine | |||
| Powertrain | Gasoline | Plug-in Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Displacement | 3,996 cm³ | 4,395 cm³ | 3,982 cm³ |
| Compression ratio | 10 | 10.5 | 8.6 |
| Bore × stroke, mm | 86 × 86 | 89 x 88,3 | 83 × 92 |
| Dimensions and capacity | |||
| Length | 4,995 mm | 5,096 mm | 4,993 mm |
| Width | 1,951 mm | 1,970 mm | 1,907 mm |
| Height | 1,460 mm | 1,510 mm | 1,447 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,929 mm | 3,006 mm (best) | 2,939 mm |
| Front track | 1,668 mm | 1,684 mm | 1,649 mm |
| Rear track | 1,650 mm | 1,660 mm | 1,595 mm |
| Ground clearance | 120 mm | — | 114 mm |
| Boot space | 565 l (best) | 466 l | 540 l |
| Boot space, seats folded | 1,680 l | — | — |
| Turning circle | 12.0 m | — | — |
| Doors | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Wheels, suspension and brakes | |||
| Tyre size | 275/35 R21 | 285/40 R20 | 265/35 R20:295/30 R20 |
| Front suspension | Independent, pneumatic | Independent, spring | Independent, pneumatic |
| Rear suspension | Independent, pneumatic | Independent, spring | Independent, pneumatic |
Result
Counted row by row on the figures above, with no editorial weighting
Ahead on the figures: Mercedes-Benz E-Class AMG
- Audi RS6ahead on 1 of 10 figures
- BMW M5ahead on 4 of 10 figures
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class AMGahead on 5 of 10 figures
Category leaders
- Main
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class AMG
- Power and torque
- BMW M5
- Fuel, consumption and emissions
- Mercedes-Benz E-Class AMG
- Dimensions and capacity
- Level
An automatic count treats every figure as equally important. A curated comparison weighs them for a specific kind of buyer.
Related comparisons
Same class or same brand